home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT1078>
- <title>
- Apr. 24, 1989: America Abroad
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Apr. 24, 1989 The Rat Race
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- WORLD, Page 36
- America Abroad
- What's Wrong with Yalta II
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By Strobe Talbott
- </p>
- <p> Mikhail Gorbachev has a nightmare, and it keeps coming true.
- In various corners of the world's last empire, demonstrators
- wave placards, some of them bearing Gorbachev's portrait; they
- hurl slogans, including some he made famous; they taunt troops,
- all of whom he commands from Moscow. Shouts lead to shots, and
- a riot becomes an enactment of Gorbachev's greatest dilemma: the
- relaxation of control can also mean disorder, which in turn can
- provoke repression, reversing reform and jeopardizing the
- political survival of the reformer. Last week it happened in
- Tbilisi. Next week, or next month, it could happen outside the
- borders of the U.S.S.R. but still within the empire, in Warsaw,
- Budapest, Prague, East Berlin. Western statesmen have their own
- dilemma. A crisis in the East, especially if it seemed to be
- fanned by the West, could play into the hands of Gorbachev's
- conservative opponents and trigger a crackdown.
- </p>
- <p> Henry Kissinger has been trying to persuade the Bush
- Administration to work out a new agreement with the Kremlin. The
- Soviet Union would commit itself to tolerate political and
- economic pluralism in Eastern Europe in exchange for Western
- guarantees of Soviet military security. The notion seems to be
- that Moscow might be more likely to allow Poland, Hungary and
- other countries to evolve toward democracy and free markets,
- perhaps even to associate themselves with the European
- Community, if NATO promises not to lure them out of the Warsaw
- Pact and perhaps desists from covert intelligence operations
- behind the Iron Curtain.
- </p>
- <p> Critics have stigmatized the proposed deal as "Yalta II," a
- repetition of Franklin Roosevelt's unwitting sellout of Eastern
- Europe in 1945. The State Department bureaucracy is unanimously
- (though anonymously) convinced that a superpower negotiation on
- the fate of Europe would offend the Europeans. Last month James
- Baker publicly floated the idea, without quite endorsing it.
- Sure enough, transatlantic cables poured into Foggy Bottom with
- protests and warnings. The British Ambassador in Washington
- sought, and received, assurances that the Administration was not
- embracing the plan. Last week Kissinger insisted that his
- purpose is not to redo Yalta but to undo it. His proposal, he
- says, is to provide Eastern Europe with the political breathing
- room to reintegrate with the West while depriving the Kremlin
- of a military pretext to interfere.
- </p>
- <p> The furor is a curious sort of testament to Kissinger.
- Twelve years out of office, he still commands immense authority,
- especially in the absence of fresh ideas from official
- Washington; the Bush Administration's long-awaited
- "national-security review" of policy toward the U.S.S.R. has
- turned out to be a prescription for business as usual. But the
- Kissinger plan is fundamentally flawed. It seeks from the men in
- the Kremlin something they are already willing to grant --
- latitude for diversity and liberalization in the "fraternal"
- countries of Eastern Europe. And it offers in return assurances
- that have little to do with the Soviets' real fears --
- political deterioration inside the bloc, not a military threat
- from outside. Moreover, the forces that stand ready to exploit
- the trouble are also internal, not external; they are domestic
- hard-liners, not CIA or Pentagon mischief-makers.
- </p>
- <p> For many of Gorbachev's comrades, the stuff of nightmares
- comes not from NATO, which Kissinger would restrain, but from
- the very process of liberalization that the former Secretary of
- State seeks to protect.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-